Review of draft-wilde-json-seq-suffix-02

[Peter Yee]

Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review result: Ready with Nits

This draft is looking better than the first two. It's in line with
the other structured syntax suffix drafts. The only comment I have
is:

Page 4, IANA Considerations, Contact name: The description of that
email address (***@ietf.org) is “Applications and Real-Time Area
Discussion”, not "Applications and Real-Time Area Working Group".
It’s not a WG that I am aware of. Did you want this to use this
address or might you prefer appsawg? APPSAWG is listed as the “ART
Area General Applications Working Group”. RFC 6839 references “Apps
Area Working Group (apps-***@ietf.org)” in its IANA Considerations
section, so I can see how you might have gotten to what you used, but
I don't think that's correct. Give some consideration to the right
name and email address for this item and the Author/Change controller.

[Alexey Melnikov]

Hi Peter,

Post by Peter Yee
Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review result: Ready with Nits
This draft is looking better than the first two. It's in line with
the other structured syntax suffix drafts. The only comment I have
Page 4, IANA Considerations, Contact name: The description of that
Discussion”, not "Applications and Real-Time Area Working Group".
It’s not a WG that I am aware of. Did you want this to use this
address or might you prefer appsawg? APPSAWG is listed as the “ART
Area General Applications Working Group”. RFC 6839 references “Apps
section, so I can see how you might have gotten to what you used, but
I don't think that's correct. Give some consideration to the right
name and email address for this item and the Author/Change controller.

apps-discuss@ is an alias for art@ (ART Area mailing list), so I think the latter is the right email to use.

[Erik Wilde]

hello.

thanks again for all the comments!

Post by Peter Yee
Page 4, IANA Considerations, Contact name: The description of that
Discussion”, not "Applications and Real-Time Area Working Group".
It’s not a WG that I am aware of. Did you want this to use this
address or might you prefer appsawg? APPSAWG is listed as the “ART
Area General Applications Working Group”. RFC 6839 references “Apps
section, so I can see how you might have gotten to what you used, but
I don't think that's correct. Give some consideration to the right
name and email address for this item and the Author/Change controller.

so i guess fixing the name (and leaving the address as it is) should be
good enough?
https://github.com/dret/I-D/commit/867e7760fe0e1b846cbfea83b4d59999e4c09661
fixes this (starting a new version -03 in the process).

thanks a lot and cheers,

dret.